Modelling Compound Properties – New Approaches and New Explanations
Date: 29-May-2014 – 01-Jun-2014
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Web Site: http://www.nytud.hu/imm16/index.html
Linguistic Field(s): Computational Linguistics; Morphology; Psycholinguistics
This is a workshop that will be held as part of the 16th International Morphology Meeting in Budapest, Hungary. All relevant organisational details can be found on the website of the main conference (www.nytud.hu/imm16/index.html).
Call for Papers:
In linguistic morphology, the properties of compounds have always attracted a great deal of interest. The term ‘properties’ is taken here to have wide scope, including all aspects of a compound’s form and meaning as well as factors that influence compound processing, production or acquisition.
Recent empirical work on compound properties has become an increasingly interdisciplinary effort, employing a variety of approaches and making use of large scale data sources, a number of experimental methods and a diversity of computational modelling techniques. Crucially, such approaches have not only been used as tools to provide adequate formal or mathematical representations of the data, but have also led to the development of new explanations of compound properties. Such explanatory factors include, for example, analogical reasoning, syntagmatic and paradigmatic informativity, patterns of distribution across texts, and competition amongst possible semantic relations during compound processing.
The aim of the workshop is to take stock of the variety of methods currently in use, to promote discussion of the explanatory aspects of the models produced and to evaluate their compatibility with one another. In particular, questions such as the following will be addressed:
– To what extent is the proposed model compatible with theoretical accounts of the property or properties in question?
– To what extent is the proposed model predictive? What are the predictions, and how could they be tested?
– To what extent is the model assumed to reflect human linguistic competence and/or behaviour? What is the justification for any such assumption?
– Do different compound properties require different types of models?
– Do different types of data (spoken corpora, written corpora, experiments) lead to different models? If so, how can these differences be accounted for?
– Does the use of more data and more sophisticated modelling facilitate the description and understanding of compound properties that would otherwise be elusive?
– Are there any quantitative corpus studies on the diachronic development of either particular compounding patterns or properties of one particular pattern?
– Are there approaches that model possible influences of language contact on the development of particular compound patterns or properties?
We invite original contributions that use empirical methods to investigate compound properties and focus on explanatory aspects of the resulting models.
Abstracts for the workshop need to be submitted via the EasyChair setup for the main conference. All instructions can be found here: http://www.nytud.hu/imm16/abssub.html. Please indicate on your abstract that it is intended for this workshop.
Arndt-Lappe, Sabine. 2011. Towards an exemplar-based model of stress in English noun-noun compounds. Jounal of Linguistics 47(11). 549–585.
Arndt-Lappe, Sabine & Melanie J. Bell. 2013. Submitted. An analogical theory of word-formation – rules, exceptions, and variability.
Baroni, Marco, Emiliano Guevara & Roberto Zamparelli. 2009. The dual nature of deverbal nominal constructions: Evidence from acceptability ratings and corpus analysis. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5(1). 27–60.
Bell, Melanie J. 2012.The English noun-noun construct: a morphological and syntactic object. In On-line Proceedings of the Eighth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM8) Cagliari, 14-17 September 2011.
Bell, Melanie J. & Ingo Plag. 2012. Informativeness is a determinant of compound stress in English. Jounal of Linguistics 48. 485–520.
Bell, Melanie J. & Martin Schäfer. 2013. Semantic transparency: challenges for distributional semantics. In Aurelie Herbelot, Roberto Zamparelli & Gemma Boleda (eds.), Proceedings of the IWCS 2013 workshop: Towards a formal distributional semantics, 1–10. Potsdam: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Gaeta, Livio & Barbara Schlücker (eds.). 2012. Das Deutsche als kompositionsfreudige Sprache. Strukturelle Eigenschaften und systembezogene Aspekte. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Gaeta, Livio & Marina Grossmann (eds.). 2009. Italian Journal of Linguistics 21(1). Special issue on compounding.
Gagné, Christina L. & Thomas L. Spalding. 2014. Conceptual composition: The role of relational competition in the comprehension of modifier-noun phrases and noun-noun compounds. In Brian H. Ross (ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 59, 97–130. New York: Elsevier.
Krott, Andrea, Robert Schreuder, R. Harald Baayen & Wolfgang U. Dressler. 2007. Analogical effects on linking elements in German compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes 22(1). 25–57.
Kuperman, Victor & Raymond Bertram. 2013. Moving spaces: Spelling alternation in English noun-noun compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes 28(7). 939–966.
Kuperman, Victor, Mark Pluymaekers & Mirjam Ernestus. 2007. Morphological predictability and acoustic duration of interfixes in Dutch compounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121. 2261–2271.
Lieber, Rochelle & Pavol Štekauer (eds.). 2009. The Oxford handbook of compounding. Oxford: OUP.
Maguire, Phil, Edward J. Wisniewski & Gert Storms. 2010. A corpus study of semantic patterns in compounding. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 6(1). 49–73.
Ramscar, Michael & Melody Dye. 2011. Learning language from input: Why innate constraints can’t explain noun compounding. Cognitive Psychology 62. 1–40.
Scalise, Sergio & Irene Vogel (eds.). 2010. Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Schlücker, Barbara & Ingo Plag. 2011. Compound or phrase? Analogy in naming. Lingua 121. 1539–1551.
Spalding, Thomas L., Christina L. Gagné, Allison C. Mullaly & Hongbo Ji. 2010. Relation-based interpretations of noun–noun phrases: A new theoretical approach. In Susan Olsen (ed.), New impulses in word-formation (Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 17), 283–315. Hamburg: Buske.